← Contents
Page 484 of 496
No. 619
Filed DECEMBER 18, 2019
Democracy & Rule of Law
First Term

House Impeaches Trump On Two Articles, The Second Of Which Charges Him With Refusing To Cooperate With The Investigation Into The First

The Filing

WASHINGTON. The House of Representatives voted Wednesday evening to impeach President Donald J. Trump on two articles, the first charging him with abusing his office to extort a foreign ally and the second charging him with obstructing the very investigation that produced the first, a structure lawmakers described as admirably efficient.

Under Article I, the President stood accused of withholding $391 million in congressionally approved military aid from Ukraine, a nation then at war with Russia, until its president agreed to publicly announce an investigation into a domestic political rival. Under Article II, the President was charged with obstruction of Congress for directing his entire administration to ignore subpoenas, withhold documents, and forbid witnesses from testifying about Article I. "It's really two accomplishments in one," said a House aide familiar with the drafting. "He committed the act, and then he blocked everyone from looking into the act. The second charge is basically a receipt for the first."

With the vote, Trump became the third president in American history to be impeached, joining Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton in a distinction the President's team immediately reframed as an exclusive honor. Sources within the administration confirmed that the campaign began soliciting donations off the impeachment within minutes, reporting record fundraising hauls and describing the historic rebuke as "the best thing that ever happened to us."

The President himself spent the evening at a rally in Battle Creek, Michigan, where he addressed the proceedings occurring in Washington. "It doesn't really feel like we're being impeached," Trump told the crowd, a sentiment legal scholars noted was technically accurate, given that the Republican-controlled Senate had already signaled it would conduct a trial with the outcome established in advance. He had earlier called the inquiry a "witch hunt" and a "hoax," phrases his supporters received as reassurance that no consequence was forthcoming.

Constitutional experts praised the obstruction article in particular as a lasting contribution to the office, observing that a president who successfully refuses all cooperation with an impeachment inquiry establishes, for every future occupant, that congressional oversight is a courtesy rather than a power. "Future historians will note that the tools of accountability were tested here and found to be optional," one scholar said. "That is not nothing."

At press time, Senate leadership had confirmed it was coordinating the terms of the trial with the defense, resolving the long-standing concern that an impeached president might have to be judged by anyone other than his own party.

Sourced to the public record · presented without editorial embellishment
← No. 618No. 620