← Contents
Page 286 of 496
No. 366
Filed JULY 16, 2018
Democracy & Rule of Law
First Term

Trump Takes Putin's Denial Over U.S. Intelligence At Helsinki, Resolving Long-Standing Concern That The President Believed The Agencies He Oversees Rather Than The Man Who Attacked The Election

The Filing

HELSINKI. Standing beside Russian President Vladimir Putin at a joint press conference Monday, President Donald J. Trump announced that he found the Russian leader's personal assurance that Russia had not interfered in the 2016 U.S. election considerably more persuasive than the unanimous conclusion of the American intelligence agencies that report to him.

"My people came to me, they said they think it's Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it's not Russia," Trump told reporters, resolving in a single sentence a standoff between the entire U.S. intelligence community and one former KGB officer in favor of the former KGB officer. "I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be."

The remarks, delivered on Russia's preferred terms during a summit Trump had requested, came three days after special counsel Robert Mueller indicted twelve Russian military intelligence officers for hacking Democratic targets, a development White House officials confirmed had been carefully reviewed and then set aside in favor of the denial of the government that employs them. The two leaders had spent the preceding two hours alone, accompanied only by translators, an arrangement aides described as ideal for a meeting whose American record would consist entirely of the President's later recollection of it.

Pressed afterward, Trump praised Putin's rejection of the findings as "extremely strong and powerful," a characterization administration sources said reflected the President's long-held position that the most credible account of an attack is generally the one offered by its suspected author. "He has a strong denial," one senior official explained, speaking on condition of anonymity. "You can't argue with a strong denial. Well, you can. The intelligence community did, at length, with evidence. But you don't have to."

The following day, facing bipartisan alarm, Trump informed the nation that he had reviewed his own remarks and identified the error, which he located in a single missing contraction. He explained that he had meant to say he did not see any reason why it "wouldn't" be Russia, a clarification that left the sentence grammatically reversed and the eighteen preceding months unaddressed.

At press time, the President had concluded that the lone defective syllable, rather than the summit, the solo meeting, or the standing ovation he had handed the Kremlin on foreign soil, was the portion of the afternoon most in need of repair.

Sourced to the public record · presented without editorial embellishment
← No. 365No. 367