← Contents
Page 224 of 496
No. 302
Filed MAY 30, 2024
Democracy & Rule of Law
Between Terms

Trump Convicted On All 34 Felony Counts In Manhattan Hush-Money Trial, Resolving Long-Standing Concern That No American President Had Ever Been A Convicted Criminal

The Filing

NEW YORK. A twelve-member jury in Manhattan reached a unanimous verdict Thursday afternoon, convicting former President Donald J. Trump on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, an outcome legal observers described as the first occasion on which the American presidency could appear on a résumé directly above a felony record.

The charges stemmed from a $130,000 payment made shortly before the 2016 election to adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, and from the reimbursements that followed, which were recorded in Trump Organization ledgers as routine "legal expenses." Prosecutors argued, and the jury agreed, that the bookkeeping entries were false. Trump thereby secured a distinction unavailable to all 44 of his predecessors, none of whom had managed to be found guilty of 34 separate crimes by a jury of citizens, a gap in the historical record that had gone unaddressed for 235 years.

Trump greeted the verdict as a triumph, telling reporters outside the courtroom that the proceeding had been "a rigged, disgraceful trial" and predicting that "the real verdict is going to be November 5th by the people," a date on which no jury would be empaneled and no rules of evidence would apply. Sources close to the former president confirmed that the conviction had been converted into campaign revenue within hours, with the operation reporting tens of millions of dollars in small-dollar donations as supporters were invited to stand beside a man a court had just identified as a criminal.

"The beauty of it is that the conviction does the work for us," said one adviser to the Trump campaign, who requested anonymity to describe the strategy candidly. "We spent years explaining that the justice system was out to get him. Now the justice system has very helpfully gone and gotten him."

The verdict also settled a question that had lingered over the 2024 race, namely whether a felony conviction disqualifies a candidate from the presidency. It does not. The Constitution lists three requirements for the office (sufficient age, residency, and natural-born citizenship), and an unblemished criminal record is not among them, an omission the framers had evidently regarded as too obvious to write down.

At press time, the former president's legal team had announced its intention to appeal the verdict, while simultaneously announcing that the trial had been so unfair that its outcome should be understood as a personal endorsement.

Sourced to the public record · presented without editorial embellishment
← No. 301No. 303