Trump Tells NBC He Is 'Not Joking' About Serving Third Term, Resolves Long-Standing Concern That 22nd Amendment Was Being Treated As Binding On Sitting Presidents
WASHINGTON. In a Sunday morning telephone interview with NBC News anchor Kristen Welker, President Donald J. Trump confirmed that he is actively considering ways to serve a third term as President of the United States, resolving a long-standing concern within the administration that the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was continuing to function as a binding limit on the number of terms a sitting president could serve.
"A lot of people want me to do it," Mr. Trump told Ms. Welker, who had reached him by phone aboard Air Force One. Asked whether the suggestion was offered in jest, the President clarified that it was not. "No, no, I'm not joking," Mr. Trump said. "I'm not joking. There are methods which you could do it." He declined to specify the methods on the call but indicated, in keeping with administration practice, that the methods would become public at the moment of their successful application.
The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951 in response to the four-term presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, provides that no person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice. Constitutional scholars consulted Sunday described the amendment as one of the clearer provisions of the document, on the order of the requirement that a President be at least 35 years old or the requirement that senators serve six-year terms. They added that the amendment was likely to remain clear regardless of how many times Mr. Trump suggested otherwise on cable television, though they conceded the question had not been previously stress-tested by a sitting president actively floating ways to circumvent it.
White House officials directed reporters to one possible "method" already in public circulation, under which Vice President JD Vance would head the 2028 Republican ticket, win the general election, and then immediately resign or otherwise transfer power to Mr. Trump, on the theory that the 22nd Amendment limits being elected to two terms but is silent on being installed into a third by procedural workaround. Asked whether the workaround had been vetted by White House counsel, one official confirmed that the counsel's office was "looking at it," the same posture the counsel's office had previously adopted toward the firing of inspectors general, the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, and the defiance of a 9 to 0 Supreme Court ruling, none of which had stopped the actions in question from being taken.
The Trump Organization's online retail platform, the President's son Eric Trump confirmed in a separate statement, has begun offering red baseball caps reading "TRUMP 2028," priced at $50, on the grounds that the merchandise represented an entirely lawful expression of a hypothetical that the President of the United States was simultaneously assuring the nation he was not joking about. A spokesperson for the company added that revenues from the cap, like revenues from the Trump-branded Bible, the Trump-branded sneaker, the $TRUMP memecoin, and the in-development Trump library Boeing 747, would not flow to the campaign that did not yet legally exist, but rather to the Trump family entity that owned the licensing rights to the President's name.
Legal observers noted that the most striking feature of the interview was not the suggestion itself, which Mr. Trump and his allies had floated in various forms throughout the campaign, but the President's confirmation, on the record, that he intended the suggestion seriously. The interview, they said, converted what had previously been described in mainstream coverage as a provocation, a troll, or a base-feeding device into a stated policy preference of a sitting head of state, an evolution they characterized as the entire mechanism by which constitutional erosion proceeds.
At press time, Mr. Trump was reviewing a draft executive order directing the Department of Justice to study whether the 22nd Amendment applied to him specifically, on the grounds that he had been denied a continuous eight-year tenure by the intervening Biden administration, a circumstance his lawyers would argue had reset the constitutional clock to a position no previous American had occupied and that therefore required a fresh, sympathetic legal analysis to be conducted by attorneys he had personally appointed.